Mets, Red Sox, Angels top MLB panic meter as biggest early concerns

Show summary Hide summary

• New York Mets — Big payroll, risky roster moves, and injury setbacks
  • What’s created the turbulence
  • Injuries and chemistry issues
• Boston Red Sox and Philadelphia Phillies — Managerial changes mask deeper issues
  • Why both clubs have stumbled
  • Early-season signals
• Los Angeles Angels — Star power hasn’t translated to wins
  • Familiar frustrations resurface
  • Stat line that worries
• San Francisco Giants — Where did the power go? Adames and Devers’ slow outputs
  • Power hitters aren’t producing
  • Red flags in plate discipline and approach
• Cincinnati Reds’ Andrew Abbott — From All-Star to adjustment season
  • Regression and the underlying numbers
  • Why the drop matters

Baseball’s calendar still says early season, but several clubs already look like they’re playing catch-up. A string of surprisingly poor performances has left front offices and fans nervously recalculating expectations, searching for signs that slow starts are temporary rather than prophetic.

Below we break down the teams and players most in need of a turnaround, the problems behind their sluggish beginnings, and the few hopeful indicators that could change the narrative if they surface soon.

New York Mets — Big payroll, risky roster moves, and injury setbacks

What’s created the turbulence

The Mets entered the year with one of baseball’s deepest payrolls but upheaval in the roster and a series of bold positional experiments have left questions. A front-office reset that moved veteran staples and asked players to adapt to new spots hasn’t produced the defensive gains promised, and the club has been more vulnerable than the payroll suggests it should be.

Injuries and chemistry issues

• Star sluggers Juan Soto and Francisco Lindor have been limited by calf issues and have only shared the field for a handful of full games — a disruption that matters for lineup cohesion and production.
• Even after a modest recent surge — including taking three of four from two weaker opponents — the Mets only just climbed out of the league’s basement, underlining how thin the margin for error has become.

Bottom line: The pieces still look talented on paper, but clubhouse transitions and injuries mean the Mets’ early record is a legitimate concern for a team paying top dollar to win now.

Boston Red Sox and Philadelphia Phillies — Managerial changes mask deeper issues

Why both clubs have stumbled

Boston and Philadelphia have each reacted to early struggles by changing managerial direction, but the reasons they started slowly go beyond personnel at the top. Boston’s offseason choices — including passing on re-signing veteran leadership — contributed to an uneasy clubhouse vibe. Philadelphia’s roster construction, heavy on veteran depth, created expectations that haven’t fully aligned with early results.

Early-season signals

• Boston promoted a minor-league manager into a charged major-league environment, a move that has not calmed questions around leadership and on-field execution.
• The Phillies, under interim leadership, got out of the gate quickly, suggesting that postseason experience and organizational stability still give them an advantage in managing adversity.

Takeaway: Both franchises have the talent and resources to recover, but the way their front offices handled the offseason left them exposed to a rough start.

Los Angeles Angels — Star power hasn’t translated to wins

Familiar frustrations resurface

Despite featuring two of the sport’s biggest names, the Angels continue to underperform. Longstanding playoff droughts and consecutive losing seasons have been a theme for years, and this spring hasn’t bucked that trend.

Stat line that worries

• The club has dropped 13 of 15 games in a brutal stretch, falling to a 13–23 record — the worst mark in MLB at the moment.
• At their current pace, they’re on track for the franchise’s first 100-loss season, a disheartening scenario for a roster with elite talent.

Context: With Mike Trout finding his groove again and the American League lacking dominant teams, the Angels’ skid feels especially wasteful — and surprisingly persistent.

San Francisco Giants — Where did the power go? Adames and Devers’ slow outputs

Power hitters aren’t producing

The Giants banked on a mix of contact-oriented hitters and two power threats to balance the lineup. That plan requires Willy Adames and Rafael Devers to supply consistent run production, but both have fallen short through the early slate of games.

• Together they’ve hit only five home runs so far.
• Their OPS figures sit below expectations — roughly .579 and .572 — leaving the lineup light on impact offense.

Red flags in plate discipline and approach

Adames’ rate of strikeouts to walks is especially concerning: he’s fanned 45 times while walking only six, a pattern that runs counter to the progression he showed over the past few seasons. The Giants’ 14–21 start shows how reliant the club is on a small number of power contributors to offset a contact-heavy roster construction.

Implication: If Adames and Devers don’t regain their power stroke and plate control, San Francisco’s offense may struggle to climb out of the hole it’s in.

Cincinnati Reds’ Andrew Abbott — From All-Star to adjustment season

Regression and the underlying numbers

Last year Andrew Abbott was an All-Star who pitched better than his peripherals suggested, posting a 2.87 ERA with a 3.66 FIP. This spring has brought a harsh correction. Abbott’s ERA has ballooned to 5.97, one of the higher marks among National League pitchers who’ve logged at least 30 innings.

Why the drop matters

• Strikeout rate has fallen sharply; he’s averaging just 6.2 K/9, the lowest of his pro career.
• Those declining swing-and-miss numbers make it tougher to rely on sequencing and defense to bail him out, increasing the chance his surface numbers are reflective of a real downturn.

What to watch: If Abbott can reclaim his strikeout ability and normalize contact management, he could still stabilize the Reds’ rotation. If not, the club will need contingency plans for innings and production.

You might also like:

• Buster Posey: Giants plan begins to pay off
• Mets offseason strategy explained: inside the team’s confusing moves
• MLB trades that could shake up the league: three realistic deals
• Cleveland Guardians injuries could change trade deadline plans
• 2026 MLB contenders’ biggest question: who will lead teams to postseason success