UK air conditioning needs a revolution to cut emissions and beat summer heat

Show summary Hide summary

• Why most UK homes lack air conditioning
• Schools, hospitals and transport: essential services pushed to the limit
• Energy grid limits and the role of renewables
• How policy choices and planning rules have made cooling harder
• Practical steps to reduce heat-related disruptions
  • Quick actions for schools and healthcare sites
• Policy realignment: balancing decarbonization with adaptation

Britain’s recent heatwave did more than make people uncomfortable—it exposed a web of policy choices and infrastructure gaps that leave homes, schools, hospitals and transport vulnerable the moment temperatures climb. What looked like a weather problem turned quickly into a systems failure: buildings without adequate cooling, an energy grid stretched thin, and planning rules that treat air conditioning as an afterthought.

The fallout was immediate and practical. Children were sent home, medical appointments were cancelled, trains broke down, and essential equipment failed. Those consequences point to a bigger question: why has the country not prepared its buildings and power system for hotter summers?

Why most UK homes lack air conditioning

Air conditioning is routine in many parts of the world, but not in Britain. While countries such as the United States and Japan equip the vast majority of homes with cooling systems, the UK has only a tiny fraction of households fitted with air conditioning.

This gap shapes how people cope indoors during heatwaves: without cooling, many residents must endure high indoor temperatures that disrupt sleep, work and daily life. The low prevalence of AC is not merely cultural; it reflects decades of planning choices, building standards and policy focus that prioritized heating solutions over mechanical cooling.

Schools, hospitals and transport: essential services pushed to the limit

Public infrastructure felt the strain as temperatures rose. Across England and Wales, hundreds of schools closed early or shifted to online lessons to protect children and staff from unsafe indoor conditions. Exams and classroom timetables were altered because school halls and classrooms became dangerously warm.

• Thousands of students experienced disrupted learning as schools shut or sent pupils home.
• Hospitals declared critical incidents and postponed outpatient appointments when facilities became overheated or specialized equipment failed.
• Rail services and office buildings reported failures and shutdowns tied directly to extreme temperatures.

When basic public services start to fail during a heatwave, it signals a deeper resilience problem—one that affects public health, education continuity and economic activity.

Energy grid limits and the role of renewables

The national energy system was tested as demand for cooling rose. Grid operators issued alerts about tight supplies, underscoring a familiar tension: renewables, while central to decarbonization goals, do not always deliver power precisely when demand spikes during hot, calm days.

On one of the hottest mornings, wind generation contributed roughly 12 percent of output while solar provided about 6 percent. Those figures help explain why the grid struggled to meet sudden increases in electricity use for cooling.

Key technical shortcomings include:

• Insufficient large-scale energy storage to smooth out supply shortfalls.
• Overreliance on weather-dependent generation that can underperform during prolonged high-pressure, low-wind periods.
• Limited spare capacity to handle rapid demand ramps from widespread air conditioning adoption.

Fixing these issues will require investments in storage, diversified generation sources, and grid upgrades so that cooling demand can be met reliably, whatever the weather.

How policy choices and planning rules have made cooling harder

Government efforts to accelerate low-carbon technologies have focused attention—and incentives—on heating solutions like heat pumps, but cooling systems have often been treated differently in practice. Planning restrictions and local enforcement have at times blocked or removed air-conditioning units from residential and mixed-use buildings.

In some local authority areas, officials have advised residents to rely on open windows and balconies rather than mechanical cooling. Meanwhile, policy changes that eased restrictions for heat pumps did not always extend the same freedoms to air-conditioning equipment. The net effect is a regulatory environment where a device designed to keep spaces warm is encouraged, while one intended to cool them can face friction and delay.

That mismatch between climate adaptation needs and regulatory incentives has real consequences: reversible heat pumps with cooling modes have been disabled in some cases, and households and institutions face lengthy approval processes to install dedicated AC systems.

Practical steps to reduce heat-related disruptions

Addressing the immediate and medium-term challenges requires a mix of regulatory reform, infrastructure investment and operational changes. Policymakers can act on several fronts to improve resilience to heat.

• Liberalize planning rules so that air-conditioning installations are no harder to approve than heat pumps, especially for residential and school use.
• Promote parity between heating and cooling in building regulations and retrofit programs, ensuring both functions can be delivered efficiently.
• Invest in energy storage and flexible capacity to absorb variability from renewables and meet peak cooling demand.
• Fund targeted cooling upgrades for vulnerable public facilities such as schools, hospitals and care homes.
• Update guidance for local planning authorities to prevent blanket bans or arbitrary enforcement actions that strip residents of cooling options.
• Encourage mixed energy portfolios—including dispatchable generation and grid-scale batteries—so demand spikes don’t overwhelm the system.

Quick actions for schools and healthcare sites

• Prioritize portable and fixed cooling units for rooms with vulnerable occupants.
• Ensure critical medical equipment like MRI scanners are in climate-controlled environments with redundant systems.
• Create emergency plans to maintain services during extreme heat, including alternative cooling locations and revised scheduling.

These targeted measures can reduce immediate risks while longer-term infrastructure upgrades are planned and delivered.

Policy realignment: balancing decarbonization with adaptation

Decarbonization goals remain important, but they must be balanced with adaptation measures that protect public health and service continuity as the climate changes. That means designing policy packages that make both low-carbon heating and adequate cooling feasible and affordable.

Practical policy changes include aligning incentives so that low-emission air conditioning technologies are supported, updating building standards to require passive and active cooling solutions in new construction, and accelerating investment in grid flexibility.

Dr Lawrence Newport is the CEO and co-founder of Looking for Growth, a political movement focused on reversing decline and strengthening Britain’s institutions.

You might also like:

• Seine in Paris cools 800 buildings in summer: river cooling draws public pride
• No electricity, no complex tech: this new cooling system drops 25°C to 3.6°C in 20 minutes
• EU aims to decarbonize industrial heat generation with plasma, solar and magnets
• Big Tech data center problem: rising energy costs and community backlash
• Largest US renewable project comes online with more power than Hoover Dam