Zack Polanski calls Reform UK hateful in controversial remark

The Green Party’s recent campaign stops have shifted quickly from local services to international flashpoints, leaving voters and commentators surprised — and uneasy. What began as a routine local-election launch in southeast London turned into a debate about the Israel-Hamas war and the party’s stance on migration and identity politics, fueling questions about which voters the Greens are now appealing to.

Beyond policy disagreements, a string of controversies involving candidates, social media messages and internal motions has amplified concerns that the Greens are attracting extreme voices. Those developments are prompting debate about whether the party’s progressive branding can survive the headline-grabbing clashes over antisemitism and immigration.

How Israel became central to a local campaign

At a Deptford event this week, Green leader Zack Polanski framed the election in stark terms — contrasting his party’s message with that of Reform UK — and almost immediately steered the conversation toward Britain’s trade ties with Israel. That pivot away from neighborhood issues like trash collection and council budgets set the tone for what followed.

Critics say Polanski’s focus on the conflict north of Israel’s border reveals a pattern: the party regularly elevates international causes in domestic debates, especially the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Supporters counter that foreign policy positions are legitimate for a national party. The tension, however, has consequences beyond rhetoric: it shapes recruiting, messaging and which activists feel welcome.

Claims of antisemitism: incidents and reactions

Allegations of antisemitic language and behavior among Greens have multiplied in recent months, prompting resignations, internal investigations and painful public exchanges. The party has been forced to confront a mix of incidents that range from inflammatory WhatsApp posts to public statements by high-profile members.

Notable episodes cited by critics

• By-election activity: The Green victory in Gorton and Denton drew attention after campaign material and local outreach emphasized anti-Israel messaging — including leaflets in Urdu — which some opponents said targeted and inflamed community divisions.
• Social media and private chats: Screenshots and reports from internal WhatsApp groups have surfaced alleging that some activists used dehumanizing language about Jewish people, or pushed conspiracy theories about attacks on Jewish institutions.
• Proposed motions: A debated party motion that would label “Zionism is racism” was postponed after backlash from both Jewish members and Greens who consider the wording too extreme.
• High-profile statements: Mothin Ali, a deputy leader, recorded remarks in October 2023 about Palestinian resistance that many found tone-deaf or inflammatory in the immediate aftermath of the Hamas attack. Ali also led a public campaign against Zecharia Deutsch, a Jewish university chaplain who had been called into Israeli military service — a campaign that critics say included false claims and contributed to serious threats against Deutsch and his family.

Those examples have convinced many observers that antisemitism is a recurring problem within the party’s ranks. The Greens deny endorsing hatred, but the accumulation of incidents has hardened public perceptions and invited media scrutiny.

Internal culture and the rise of fringe voices

Some analysts link the Greens’ perceived openness to radical viewpoints to a wider trend: as a party grows and welcomes new members, vetting can lag. Rapid expansion after electoral successes can also bring in activists motivated by single issues rather than the party’s full platform.

Critics argue this has created a space for sectarian or conspiratorial voices to flourish, while the party’s leadership is sometimes slow to respond. Supporters of the Greens counter that suspensions and investigations have been carried out and that activism on Palestine does not equate to antisemitism.

How internal debates play out publicly

• Media interviews: National outlets have put party leaders on the spot, asking whether a wave of new candidates has introduced extremists. These exchanges often reinforce the idea that the party is wrestling with its identity.
• Membership disputes: Local branches have clashed over candidate selections and whether certain activists should be allowed to stand for office.
• Delayed votes: Contentious policy proposals have been postponed as leadership tries to manage fallout and avoid alienating either progressive members or concerned minority communities.

Policy positions driving voter unease — migration and borders

Beyond antisemitism allegations, the Greens’ migration platform has become a political lightning rod. Their policy documents include ambitious proposals on border controls, asylum and citizenship that opponents describe as open-borders advocacy.

Key elements critics highlight include proposals to end immigration detention, to allow many asylum seekers to remain, and to remove language and income thresholds for settlement. The party has also discussed instant rights for arrivals, including easier visa processes and expanded voting eligibility.

To many voters, those ideas suggest a radical reshaping of immigration policy that could accelerate migration flows and strain public services. Supporters of the Greens argue their proposals are humane and address long-standing injustices in the asylum system.

Public opinion vs. party proposals

• Polling data: A broad swath of the public expresses concern about high net migration; some surveys put the share of people saying immigration is too high at around 70 percent, including significant minorities.
• Electoral risk: Analysts warn that a platform seen as permissive on migration may collide with wider public sentiment and damage the Greens’ electoral prospects outside urban progressive strongholds.
• Expert commentary: Think-tank voices have suggested that a Green government pursuing these policies would dramatically increase migration, a prediction that opponents use to stoke fear among voters.

Political consequences: who benefits and who is alienated?

The controversies embroiling the Greens create opportunities and risks across the political spectrum. Reform and conservative parties claim the space of voters uncomfortable with the Greens’ approach to migration and community relations. At the same time, progressive activists who prioritize climate and social justice worry that the party’s moral authority is being undermined.

Party leaders face a choice between cracking down hard on extremist elements and preserving broad ideological coalitions. That balancing act will shape candidate selection, campaign tone and whether the Greens can convert media attention into lasting support.

Issues for voters to watch

• Candidate vetting and disciplinary processes — whether the party acts decisively on complaints.
• Clarity on foreign policy positions, particularly toward Israel and Palestine, and how these are presented during local and national campaigns.
• Concrete migration policy detail and responses to public concerns about integration and public services.
• How the party communicates with minority communities affected by both antisemitism and anti-Muslim sentiment.

Media spotlight and political framing

National broadcasters and newspapers are framing the Greens as a party at a crossroads: newly energized and electorally competitive on one hand, and mired in controversy on the other. High-profile interviews have reinforced the narrative that the party’s growth has exposed weaknesses in internal governance and judgment.

How the Greens respond next — tightening candidate selection, clarifying policy, or doubling down — will determine whether these controversies become a temporary headache or a lasting liability. The coming weeks of local campaigning will be a test of both discipline and direction as voters process what the party now represents.

You might also like:

• Anti-Zionism increasingly seen as an ideology of hatred
• Shabana Mahmood surge: why voters are suddenly drawn to the Labour MP
• Keir Starmer, Labour leader, called weak, unprincipled and unremarkable by critics
• Islamo-left alliance: are Gorton and Denton making one final push?
• UK Labour Party risks final nail in its coffin after latest setback

Robert Johnson

Robert Johnson is a dedicated columnist focusing on political and social debates. With twelve years in editorial writing, he provides nuanced, well‑argued perspectives. His commentaries invite you to form your own views and engage in critical issues.