College football week 1 upsets: Texas, Alabama, Clemson and Notre Dame fall

Week one of the college football season delivered chaos: four programs ranked inside the top 10 lost outright, and the early playoff conversation looks wildly different than it did a week ago. These upsets didn’t come from scrappy underdogs alone — established contenders stumbled, exposing flaws that could matter come November.

Some teams still look like legitimate national-title threats despite their setbacks, while others revealed problems that can’t be ignored. Below is a breakdown of what went wrong, what still matters, and which teams have the best path back into the playoff picture.

Big Upsets That Shift the Early College Football Playoff Narrative

There’s no sugarcoating it: this opening weekend felt like a midseason shakeup. Upsets against highly ranked teams force voters, committee members and fans to reassess strength of schedule and depth. For each team below, we outline the game context, the core issues exposed, and the indicators that suggest either recovery or regression.

Texas Longhorns: Scoring Woes in Columbus Put Pressure on Arch Manning

Texas traveled to Ohio State and came away with a puzzling 14-7 loss despite moving the ball at times. Stat lines can be misleading: the Longhorns outgained the Buckeyes in yardage, and the ground game showed competence, yet points were scarce.

The biggest concern centers on Arch Manning. Ohio State designed a plan to limit his mobility and force him into downfield passing situations, and Manning didn’t convert when it mattered. Even when given time in the pocket, Texas failed to produce enough explosive plays to flip the scoreboard.

• Positives: Strong rushing attack, elite defensive unit that can keep games low-scoring.
• Concerns: Inconsistent downfield passing, red-zone punching woes, and questions about Manning’s ability to create under pressure.
• What to watch: Manning’s decision-making and accuracy in coming weeks; can the offense sustain drives and convert third downs?

Alabama Crimson Tide: Offensive Line Issues and Pressure in Tallahassee

Alabama’s 31-17 loss at Florida State surprised many, but the Seminoles were far from a pushover. Florida State’s quarterback exceeded expectations and the Seminoles executed a game plan that exposed Alabama’s front units.

On offense, the Tide struggled to protect their quarterback and finish drives. Drops and repeated pressure disrupted rhythm, and the running game didn’t consistently threaten Florida State’s defense. Defensively, Alabama had moments but also allowed key designed quarterback runs that turned momentum.

• Positives: Defensive playmaking potential remains; this team won’t be written off after one road loss.
• Concerns: Offensive line play, chemistry in the passing game, and secondary contain on mobile quarterbacks.
• What to watch: O-line adjustments and whether the coaching staff can shore up pass protection before conference play intensifies.

Clemson Tigers: Defense Holds—but Offense Lacks Depth and a Running Identity

Clemson’s home defeat to LSU, 17-10, reinforced one truth and revealed another: Clemson’s defense can still dominate, but the offense may not have the depth to execute when tempo is turned up.

LSU’s strategic tempo and consistent pressure highlighted Clemson’s shallow rotation up front. The Tiger quarterback made some high-quality throws but was forced into hurried decisions, and the run game was virtually non-existent. Mistakes at key moments gave LSU chances it converted.

• Positives: Defense played to its billing; capable of keeping Clemson competitive in tight games.
• Concerns: Lack of offensive line depth, limited rushing production, and a few costly turnovers.
• What to watch: How Coach Brian Kelly’s scheme adapts to protect the quarterback and resurrect a functional ground attack over the next few weeks.

Notre Dame Fighting Irish: Running Game Shortfalls and Identity Questions

Notre Dame’s 27-24 loss at Miami exposed lingering doubts about the Irish’s identity. The team’s inability to establish a consistent rushing attack put extra pressure on the passing game and left the offense one-dimensional.

Miami’s rebuilt defensive front dictated the line of scrimmage early, limiting Notre Dame’s ability to control tempo. The quarterback play showed flashes, but without a reliable running game to anchor drives, sustaining offensive momentum proved difficult.

• Positives: Passing attack showed enough capability to keep the offense in games when drops and pressure are minimized.
• Concerns: Low rush volume, offensive line run-blocking, and dependency on explosive passing to win.
• What to watch: Whether the coaching staff can recommit to a ground-first identity and give ballcarriers enough touches to reestablish balance.

You might also like:

• Bo Nix, rising Broncos offense reshape AFC playoff picture
• College football week recap: Indiana’s miracle, Oregon survives, Texas Tech on the rise
• Notre Dame 0-2 start: are the Fighting Irish victims of a runner-up curse?
• Super Bowl LXI long shots: teams that could be the next Seattle Seahawks
• College football week 6 power rankings: Ohio State leads, Miami and Oregon close behind

John Davis

John Davis is a sports journalist focused on the NBA, NFL, and major global championships. With seven years of live coverage, he breaks down performances and key strategies. His expertise gives you a clear view of every game and its impact.