Greens under fire for embracing Islamic sectarianism

The Green Party’s latest campaign ad in the Gorton and Denton by-election has turned heads — not just for its message but for the language and imagery it uses. Released in Urdu and aimed squarely at Muslim voters in Manchester, the short film frames voting as a battle over community safety and dignity, and has sparked heated debate about identity, outreach, and political strategy ahead of a tightly watched local contest.

What began as a targeted outreach effort has morphed into a flashpoint, exposing deep tensions between parties and voter blocs. The clip accuses opponents of stoking Islamophobia and threatening families who have lived in the area for years, while the campaign’s broader messaging has drawn fire for appearing to pit one community directly against others.

How the Urdu video frames the election and who it targets

The video opens with a woman speaking in Urdu: an intimate, neighborhood-focused appeal that lists everyday roles — shopkeepers, drivers, cleaners, mothers — and stresses their centrality to local life. Green candidate Hannah Spencer follows in the same language, urging viewers to back the Greens to prevent a victory for Reform UK. The ad names Reform UK’s candidate and accuses the party of policies that would “break up our communities,” deport long-standing families, and increase taxes on people born abroad.

By communicating in Urdu, the Greens signaled a direct appeal to voters of Pakistani heritage in wards where the Muslim population can reach about 40 percent. That choice — unusual for a major party’s paid media — was clearly designed to resonate with first- and second-generation immigrants who use Urdu at home and in community spaces.

Imagery and messages used to link parties, leaders, and global events

The ad doesn’t limit itself to local grievances. It juxtaposes images and footage intended to draw broader political lines:

• Photos of Reform UK’s candidate alongside critical voiceovers condemning deportations and anti-Muslim rhetoric.
• Clips showing UK Labour leaders next to international figures such as India’s prime minister and Israel’s leader, implying complicity or alignment.
• International footage — U.S. immigration enforcement arrests and scenes of destruction in Gaza — to connect domestic policy to global crises.
• Everyday shots of Manchester Muslims working in shops, sweeping streets, and serving customers, underlining the local, human stakes.

These visual choices fold local and global narratives together, using Gaza and immigration as lenses through which to interpret national politics. In doing so, the campaign frames the Greens as the defender of dignity for Muslim residents and casts rival parties as part of the problem.

Leaflets, social posts and on-the-ground appeals: a pattern of sectarian outreach?

The video is part of a wider communications package. Leaflets distributed locally show Spencer wearing a keffiyeh in front of a mosque with the English slogan “Stop Islamophobia. Stop Reform.” The Urdu side delivers a more explicit appeal: urging voters to punish Labour over Gaza and to give Muslims “a strong voice” by electing the Greens.

Other campaign materials and candidate-made clips narrow the focus further. One local Green council hopeful produced a short video urging Muslims to support Spencer because she stands with the global “ummah.” Meanwhile, the Green leadership’s social channels have been notably consumed with Palestine-related posts, frequently criticizing the UK Labour government for its stance.

Key tactics visible in campaign materials

• Language-targeted advertising (Urdu) to reach first-language speakers.
• Iconography associating the candidate with solidarity symbols and places of worship.
• Emotive references to Gaza and migration to mobilize protesters of foreign policy.
• Direct appeals to religious identity as a voting cue.

Political alliances and pressure groups shaping the strategy

The campaign’s approach reflects broader realignments on the left and within community organizing. Groups that mobilized pro-Palestine candidates in past elections have expressed support for the Greens, and social movements focused on Muslim voters appear to be exerting influence on messaging and priorities.

That influence became a subject of national interest during a televised debate between Spencer and Reform candidate Matt Goodwin. When Goodwin raised the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing and its perpetrator’s jihadist motives, Spencer declined to attribute the attack to “Islam” or “Islamism,” instead blaming divisive political rhetoric. The exchange highlighted the tension between acknowledging extremist violence and avoiding narratives that might stigmatize Muslim communities.

Why this style of campaigning matters for Manchester and beyond

Local elections may seem parochial, but the stakes in Gorton and Denton have wider political implications. Polling suggests the Greens are competitive — possibly able to unseat major-party dominance in a seat long contested by Labour and the Conservatives. A by-election upset would be more than symbolic; it would signal growing fragmentation in British politics.

Yet the tactics being used raise difficult questions about identity-based mobilization and the risks of deepening societal divisions. Opponents say the approach amounts to sectarian politics — cleaving the electorate along religious and ethnic lines and using charged international issues to consolidate votes. Supporters argue it’s necessary outreach to communities whose concerns have been marginalized.

Potential consequences to watch

1. A lasting shift in local political allegiances, especially among Muslim and student voters.
2. An increase in targeted, language-specific campaigning across other constituencies.
3. Heightened polarization around international issues like Gaza spilling into municipal and national politics.
4. Pressure on mainstream parties to recalibrate how they address community-specific grievances and identity concerns.

Reactions from parties, voters, and civic leaders

Responses have been mixed. Some community members welcomed the outreach as acknowledgement of their lived experiences; others criticized it for reducing complex issues to a blunt electoral calculation. Labour officials have pushed back against suggestions they support policies blamed for civilian suffering abroad, while Reform UK framed the messaging as divisive and opportunistic.

Local activists, faith leaders, and campaign groups are also weighing in, some calling for more inclusive appeals that don’t single out or privilege one group over others. The debate now extends beyond the by-election itself to how political parties will balance targeted outreach with commitments to social cohesion.

Coverage of the Gorton and Denton race is intensifying as the vote approaches, with national attention focused on whether a small, language-targeted ad represents a savvy outreach maneuver or a worrying precedent for identity-based campaigning in UK elections.

You might also like:

• Islamo-left alliance: are Gorton and Denton making one final push?
• Islamic sectarianism is undermining democracy
• Labour safe seats: no constituency is guaranteed
• Elections on island of strangers expose social fault lines
• Zack Polanski calls Reform UK hateful in controversial remark

Robert Johnson

Robert Johnson is a dedicated columnist focusing on political and social debates. With twelve years in editorial writing, he provides nuanced, well‑argued perspectives. His commentaries invite you to form your own views and engage in critical issues.