Margot Robbie on Wuthering Heights: why Cathy and Isabella are fighting

Show summary Hide summary

• Fennell’s Wuthering Heights: Why it’s sparking debate
• Rewriting female agency: Cathy and Isabella in the director’s view
  • What the actors said about agency
• On-screen heat: the chemistry that anchors the chaos
• Costume theater: outfits that stop the audience
  • Standout looks and reactions
• Choices, consequences, and the moral engine of the film
• Moments from the press junket: setting and highlights
• Audience reaction and what to expect at the theater

Emerald Fennell’s reimagining of Wuthering Heights arrives like a gust across a moody moor: loud, divisive, and impossible to ignore. The film mixes gothic tragedy with flashes of camp, creating a version of Emily Brontë’s classic that leans into appetite, anger, and spectacle. For many viewers the result will be polarizing; for others it’s an intoxicating reinvention.

At a recent press day held on the historic grounds of a sprawling estate, Margot Robbie and Alison Oliver unpacked what made their characters feel modern, messy, and deliberately provocative — from the combustible chemistry with Jacob Elordi’s Heathcliff to wardrobe moments that repeatedly drew gasps in screening rooms.

Fennell’s Wuthering Heights: Why it’s sparking debate

Emerald Fennell has remade the tale with a distinctive voice: stylized, confrontational, and unapologetically feminine in its focus. Critics and audiences are already arguing about everything from casting choices to tone. Some of the hot-button talking points include:

• Casting and historical interpretation — the decision to present Heathcliff as white has drawn accusations of whitewashing and reignited broader conversations about representation in adaptations.
• Tone and genre — the movie blends gothic despair with a kind of gleeful theatricality that can feel both exhilarating and unsettling.
• Female desire as plot engine — Fennell foregrounds the wants and actions of Cathy and Isabella, making their drives central to the narrative rather than mere background motives.

This Wuthering Heights is built to divide: some will call it audacious, others will call it irreverent. Either way, it’s meant to be felt, loudly.

Rewriting female agency: Cathy and Isabella in the director’s view

One of the film’s clearest departures from many period adaptations is how actively the women shape the story. Robbie and Oliver emphasized that their characters are not passive victims of circumstance but decision-makers — often reckless, sometimes cruel, and frequently driven by desire.

Both characters are messy and undeniably human; they act, make mistakes, and create consequences that ripple through the film. That moral complexity was intentional: Fennell gives them room to be angry, sexual, and infuriating, rather than softened for audience comfort.

What the actors said about agency

• Margot Robbie described a garden scene — two women vying for the same man — as unexpectedly liberating to film, a kind of radical throwback to scenes audiences haven’t seen in a long time.
• Alison Oliver noted that even within the constraints of the period, Emerald’s script offered each woman a form of control and autonomy that felt important to portray.

On-screen heat: the chemistry that anchors the chaos

As soon as Robbie and Jacob Elordi shared the screen, many viewers found their dynamic impossible to look away from. The pair brought a combustible mix of charm and volatility that gave emotional weight to Fennell’s heightened choices.

Actors and crew noticed it early on; small moments in early takes hinted at a deeper intensity that the film built into full force. Robbie recalled instances from the first day of shooting where proximity and exchange created an immediate spark — a signal that the romantic tumult at the center of the story would land.

• Robbie called for charisma and chemistry on-screen — qualities she feels are often missing from contemporary cinema.
• Oliver compared watching Robbie and Elordi to seeing classic Hollywood pairings, describing the performances as intimate and cinematic in an old-school way.

Costume theater: outfits that stop the audience

The production’s wardrobe quickly became a focal point for viewers. Period pieces were reworked with theatrical flair — luxurious fabrics, dramatic silhouettes, and shock-value reveals that prompted audible responses in theaters.

Costume reveals were ritualized on set: long makeup and fitting processes followed by synchronized debuts that made both actresses feel transformed.

Standout looks and reactions

• The swing scene outfit — a layered ensemble with black velvet and intricate chainwork — stood out as a favorite for its visual power and historical callbacks.
• Both actresses admitted they would break character watching each other’s entrances, disarmed by how beautiful and potent the costumes made the characters feel.

Choices, consequences, and the moral engine of the film

Robbie stressed that Cathy and Isabella are architects of their own downfalls — they choose, act, and then contend with what follows. Far from being subjects of fate, they push the drama forward through intentional, often self-destructive decisions.

The film’s plot is therefore less about what happens to women and more about what women cause to happen — a switch that reframes the narrative’s moral center.

Moments from the press junket: setting and highlights

The press events for the film leaned into its theatricality: interviews took place amid period-appropriate installations and a stately mansion backdrop that amplified the movie’s heightened world. Both actors spoke candidly about how immersive the production design felt and how that environment influenced their performances.

• The setting underscored the film’s blend of realism and artifice, mirroring Fennell’s approach to reworking a canonical text.
• Actors reflected on the odd pleasure of performing scenes that feel both decadent and morally complicated.

Audience reaction and what to expect at the theater

From the gasps at costume reveals to the chatter about casting and tone, early screenings suggest this adaptation will spark weeks of debate. Whether audiences love it, hate it, or land somewhere in between, the film is engineered to provoke conversation — and strong feelings.

Wuthering Heights is now playing in theaters; viewers should expect a version of the story that foregrounds desire, spectacle, and deliberately messy female protagonists.

You might also like:

• Wuthering Heights by Emerald Fennell whitewashes Heathcliff: opening scene almost drove reviewer out
• Amazon Prime Video: Dove Cameron, Avan Jogia say their characters are both messed up in the red
• People we meet on vacation: Emily Bader and Tom Blyth want men to yearn more
• Is God Is lets Black women feel their rage and find catharsis
• Kirsten Dunst says working with female directors in Hollywood is very simple